Amazon Enforcement Inconsistency: Dual Account Comparison
This page documents direct enforcement contradictions between two unified Amazon accounts:
- Main Account: A1LTMDBMBP1XZ0 (Active)
- Section 3 Account: A31HZK8OKTTL95 (Reinstated Jan 2025)
Although both accounts operate under the same identity in the North American unified marketplace, Amazon’s internal trust systems (SIP/TRMS/ASR) apply brand restrictions unevenly. This table shows dozens of examples where:
- ✅ One account can still list the brand or ASIN
- ⛔ The other account is fully gated, blocked, or unable to apply
- ⚠️ Some listings say “Requires Approval” but allow selling without restriction
📊 Brand & Category Comparison Table
Brand / Category | Main Account | Section 3 Account | Discrepancy Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Panasonic | ✅ Can list | ⛔ Gated – Requires invoice, no unit quantity stated | Trust score gating not policy-based |
Royal Purple | ⛔ Gated | ✅ Can list | Not brand-controlled; backend trust flaw |
Scott’s | ⛔ Gated | ✅ Can list | Major trust scoring inconsistency |
Energizer | ⛔ Fully restricted – Cannot apply | ⚠️ Gated but application allowed | Inconsistent gating pathways |
Books Category | ✅ Allowed | ⛔ Gated – Blocked at category level | Wiped category access due to trust downgrade |
VO5 | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⛔ Hard gated – Application required | UI logic detached from backend enforcement |
Assured | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⛔ Fully gated – Application blocked | Double-standard application logic |
Equate | ✅ Can list | ✅ Can list | Consistent – rare example |
Hyper Tough | ✅ Can list | ⛔ Gated | Flag applied post-reinstatement |
Mainstays | ✅ Can list | ⛔ Gated | Flag logic suppressing Walmart brands |
Great Neck | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – Can list | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – Can list | Inconsistently enforced labeling |
Music Category | ✅ Can list | ⛔ Blocked – Requires approval for category | Proof of account trust reset after reinstatement |
Neutrogena | ✅ Can list | ⛔ Fully gated – Application blocked | Trust scoring override (not brand-imposed) |
S.O.S | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⚠️ Same behavior | Consistent UI bug on both accounts |
Brill | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⛔ Gated | Flag decay triggered after reinstatement |
Zote | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⛔ Gated | Hard restriction mismatch |
Arizona (Beverages) | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⛔ Gated in Grocery, ASIN, and Brand | Clear account segmentation at system level |
LA’s Totally Awesome | ⚠️ Says “Needs Approval” – But can list | ⚠️ Same | Misleading UI that confuses sellers |
Pringles | ⛔ Gated | ⛔ Gated | Consistent gating – likely brand enforced |
Fisher-Price | ⛔ No “Apply” option shown | ⛔ No “Apply” option shown | Globally misclassified brand |
🧠 What This Proves
These examples confirm Amazon is not applying consistent logic, policy, or brand guidelines. The enforcement behavior is:
- 📉 Based on internal trust flags, not product compliance
- ⏳ Affected by time-decay logic tied to ASIN activity
- 🔄 Contradictory across unified accounts — for the same brands, the same SKUs, under the same business identity
🔎 Want to see more? Visit the full pre-arbitration documentation:
👉 https://seanvandenberg.com/amazon-escalation-pre-arbitration/
All records are timestamped, preserved, and submitted as evidence in ongoing pre-arbitration correspondence and FOIA-linked complaints.